8. November 2024
Disputes Quick Read – 9 von 105 Insights
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has updated its guidance on the use of Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) – importantly it has made it clear that this is relevant to all NDAs regardless of the context in which the NDA arises. The guidance also makes clear that what is meant by "NDA" is any form of agreement or contract, or a clause within a wider agreement or contract, under which it is agreed that certain information will be kept confidential. This includes agreements with individuals and other commercial parties.
The SRA initially issued a warning notice about the use of NDAs in March 2018. This was in the context of the #MeToo movement and specifically the improper use of NDAs in relation to sexual misconduct which prevented people who had experienced sexual harassment from reporting it to the relevant authorities. It has been updated since then.
The updated guidance provides a reminder of some of the key issues and risks that those dealing with NDAs need to be aware of and the obligations regulated persons have under the general SRA's Code of Conduct. It says it is particularly concerned to ensure that NDAs are not used to prevent reporting to it or to other regulators and enforcement agencies or to prevent disclosures which are protected by law. The guidance states that clauses used must not prevent any such disclosure or give the person expected to agree the NDA the impression that this kind of disclosure is prohibited. This includes other terms in the agreement which might serve to inhibit permitted reporting by way of their operation.
The guidance now has a much broader application and must be considered by anyone regulated by the SRA in whatever situation an NDA (including confidentiality clauses within the context of any wider agreement) is being considered. It will be applicable to in-house lawyers and regulated individuals who manage human resources and complaints in law firms as well as relevant individuals in law firms. It also serves as a reminder to review and update precedents which seek to impose confidentiality obligations on a signatory to ensure they are current and fit for purpose.
The latest guidance is available here.
Andrew Howell and Natalia Faekova unpack an extraordinary case. A Mexican billionaire's strong fraud claim. Former Israeli intelligence operatives hired to target the defendant's solicitor. Secret recordings over wine and dinner. A judge who called it 'anathema to civil litigation' but may have been 'too lenient'.
19. November 2025
During an LSLA lecture on transparency and open justice, Mrs Justice Cockerill, recently appointed as Deputy Head of Civil Justice, outlined a pilot practice direction (PD) that will place select court documents squarely in the public domain via a new, public-facing side of the electronic court file (CE-File).
21. Oktober 2025
11. Juni 2025
30. Januar 2025
6. Dezember 2024
14. November 2024
14. November 2024
8. November 2024
15. Oktober 2024
14. Dezember 2023
13. Dezember 2023
17. Oktober 2023
4. August 2023
21. Juli 2023
10. Juli 2023
1. Juni 2023
20. April 2023
8. März 2023
2. März 2023
14. Februar 2023
13. Februar 2023
8. Februar 2023
19. Januar 2023
3. Oktober 2022
22. September 2022
9. August 2022
25. Juli 2022
6. Juli 2022
Welcome news for those pursuing fraud claims in the English Courts
28. Juli 2022
27. Juli 2022
29. Juli 2022
17. Juni 2022
13. Juni 2022
26. Mai 2022
31. Mai 2022
4. April 2022
5. April 2022
31. März 2022
21. September 2021
13. September 2021
6. September 2021
2. August 2021
21. Juli 2021
15. Juli 2021
26. Mai 2021
5. Mai 2021
21. April 2021
31. März 2021
26. Februar 2021
24. Februar 2021
20. Januar 2021
12. Januar 2021
23. November 2020
16. Oktober 2020
23. September 2020
7. Oktober 2020
12. Mai 2020
18. Mai 2020
15. April 2020
27. April 2020
21. April 2020
11. März 2020
26. Februar 2020
21. Februar 2020
2. Juni 2020
16. Juni 2020
9. Juli 2020
21. Juli 2020
3. Dezember 2021
24. November 2021
8. Oktober 2021
10. Januar 2022
20. Januar 2022
22. März 2022
7. April 2022