7. Mai 2020
Disputes Quick Read – 80 von 105 Insights
When Unexplained Wealth Orders (UWO) were introduced, legal commentators pondered whether the legislation was another idle threat to bolster the government's announcements that we must clamp down on businesses using off shore accounts and overseas investment funds purchasing UK property portfolios in an attempt to avoiding paying tax.
In reality, the National Crime Agency (NCA) has primarily targeted wealthy families.
Once made the subject of an order, an individual is required by the authorities to provide a detailed account of how they came to own an asset, shifting the burden of proof away from authorities. In short, individuals are required to prove the legitimacy of their assets or risk forfeiting them.
To obtain an UWO, the enforcement agency must establish that there is property worth in excess of £50,000 (or a number of properties to that cumulative value) owned by an individual who is either politically exposed, suspected of having committed a serious crime or is someone "connected" to a person suspected of such – a very low bar indeed.
Zamira Hajiyeva, "the woman who spent £16m at Harrods", was the first subject of a UWO. This order was challenged but ultimately upheld by the High Court, representing an early victory for the NCA. Buoyed by the win, the NCA then set their sights on Kazakh Nurali Aliyev and his mother Dariga Nazarbayeva, High Net Worth political individuals based in Kazakhstan.
Having obtained the UWOs, the NCA's success was short lived as, on 8 April 2020, the High Court handed down a damming judgment stating the NCA had proceeded on "unreliable evidence". The key principle of the ruling was that the use of off-shore structures, while demonstrative, is not conclusive evidence of criminal property.
While this gives private client lawyers and their clients a bit of breathing space, we doubt the NCA will be discouraged by the ruling. It will, however, require the NCA to think twice before chasing the low hanging fruit by simply targeting any offshore structure. As for lawyers, we must continue to scrutinise and challenge "evidence" the NCA presents against our clients.
Andrew Howell and Natalia Faekova unpack an extraordinary case. A Mexican billionaire's strong fraud claim. Former Israeli intelligence operatives hired to target the defendant's solicitor. Secret recordings over wine and dinner. A judge who called it 'anathema to civil litigation' but may have been 'too lenient'.
19. November 2025
During an LSLA lecture on transparency and open justice, Mrs Justice Cockerill, recently appointed as Deputy Head of Civil Justice, outlined a pilot practice direction (PD) that will place select court documents squarely in the public domain via a new, public-facing side of the electronic court file (CE-File).
21. Oktober 2025
11. Juni 2025
30. Januar 2025
6. Dezember 2024
14. November 2024
14. November 2024
8. November 2024
15. Oktober 2024
14. Dezember 2023
13. Dezember 2023
17. Oktober 2023
4. August 2023
21. Juli 2023
10. Juli 2023
1. Juni 2023
20. April 2023
8. März 2023
2. März 2023
14. Februar 2023
13. Februar 2023
8. Februar 2023
19. Januar 2023
3. Oktober 2022
22. September 2022
9. August 2022
25. Juli 2022
6. Juli 2022
Welcome news for those pursuing fraud claims in the English Courts
28. Juli 2022
27. Juli 2022
29. Juli 2022
17. Juni 2022
13. Juni 2022
26. Mai 2022
31. Mai 2022
4. April 2022
5. April 2022
31. März 2022
21. September 2021
13. September 2021
6. September 2021
2. August 2021
21. Juli 2021
15. Juli 2021
26. Mai 2021
5. Mai 2021
21. April 2021
31. März 2021
26. Februar 2021
24. Februar 2021
20. Januar 2021
12. Januar 2021
23. November 2020
16. Oktober 2020
23. September 2020
7. Oktober 2020
12. Mai 2020
18. Mai 2020
15. April 2020
27. April 2020
21. April 2020
11. März 2020
26. Februar 2020
21. Februar 2020
2. Juni 2020
16. Juni 2020
9. Juli 2020
21. Juli 2020
3. Dezember 2021
24. November 2021
8. Oktober 2021
10. Januar 2022
20. Januar 2022
22. März 2022
7. April 2022