7. Oktober 2020
Disputes Quick Read – 76 von 105 Insights
On 1 October 2020, the London Court of Arbitrations brought in updated rules that modernise the way LCIA arbitrations are conducted and bring the rules into line with current trends.
Overall, we think these are positive changes that will help support the efficient determination of disputes, for the reasons outlined below.
The first notable improvement in the LCIA's rules relates to multi-contract disputes. Following the decision of A v B [2017] EWHC 3417 (Comm), multi-contract disputes couldn't be started in a single process. This was problematic, as disputes between the same parties can often concern multiple independent contracts. Fortunately, the rules now invite parties to address all issues in a single reference, driving efficiency and cost saving.
The rules around the early determination process have also been updated for the better. Tribunals now have the power to expedite proceedings by limiting written statements and witness evidence, and by making early determinations in scenarios where cases are advanced which are "manifestly without merit" or outside the arbitral jurisdiction. Although it's yet to be seen how often these powers will be used, we believe that Tribunals being empowered to dispose of claims quickly in appropriate circumstances is undoubtedly the right call.
Finally, the updated rules acknowledge the use of virtual hearings and electronic communications, both of which have proven vital during the COVID-19 pandemic. While the LCIA has said that the pandemic hasn't instituted a change of focus, it has "allowed the LCIA to address explicitly some changes in good practice". Either way, clearer rules over electronic filings and communication (Article 4), and the express provision for the Tribunal to order a virtual hearing (Article 19), are welcome additions to the framework, in our view.
A more in-depth analysis of the LCIA's updated rules is available here. If you'd like to discuss any of the issues raised in this article in greater detail, please contact a member of our Disputes and Investigations team.
Andrew Howell and Natalia Faekova unpack an extraordinary case. A Mexican billionaire's strong fraud claim. Former Israeli intelligence operatives hired to target the defendant's solicitor. Secret recordings over wine and dinner. A judge who called it 'anathema to civil litigation' but may have been 'too lenient'.
19. November 2025
During an LSLA lecture on transparency and open justice, Mrs Justice Cockerill, recently appointed as Deputy Head of Civil Justice, outlined a pilot practice direction (PD) that will place select court documents squarely in the public domain via a new, public-facing side of the electronic court file (CE-File).
21. Oktober 2025
11. Juni 2025
30. Januar 2025
6. Dezember 2024
14. November 2024
14. November 2024
8. November 2024
15. Oktober 2024
14. Dezember 2023
13. Dezember 2023
17. Oktober 2023
4. August 2023
21. Juli 2023
10. Juli 2023
1. Juni 2023
20. April 2023
8. März 2023
2. März 2023
14. Februar 2023
13. Februar 2023
8. Februar 2023
19. Januar 2023
3. Oktober 2022
22. September 2022
9. August 2022
25. Juli 2022
6. Juli 2022
Welcome news for those pursuing fraud claims in the English Courts
28. Juli 2022
27. Juli 2022
29. Juli 2022
17. Juni 2022
13. Juni 2022
26. Mai 2022
31. Mai 2022
4. April 2022
5. April 2022
31. März 2022
21. September 2021
13. September 2021
6. September 2021
2. August 2021
21. Juli 2021
15. Juli 2021
26. Mai 2021
5. Mai 2021
21. April 2021
31. März 2021
26. Februar 2021
24. Februar 2021
20. Januar 2021
12. Januar 2021
23. November 2020
16. Oktober 2020
23. September 2020
7. Oktober 2020
12. Mai 2020
18. Mai 2020
15. April 2020
27. April 2020
21. April 2020
11. März 2020
26. Februar 2020
21. Februar 2020
2. Juni 2020
16. Juni 2020
9. Juli 2020
21. Juli 2020
3. Dezember 2021
24. November 2021
8. Oktober 2021
10. Januar 2022
20. Januar 2022
22. März 2022
7. April 2022