7 octobre 2020
Disputes Quick Read – 76 de 105 Publications
On 1 October 2020, the London Court of Arbitrations brought in updated rules that modernise the way LCIA arbitrations are conducted and bring the rules into line with current trends.
Overall, we think these are positive changes that will help support the efficient determination of disputes, for the reasons outlined below.
The first notable improvement in the LCIA's rules relates to multi-contract disputes. Following the decision of A v B [2017] EWHC 3417 (Comm), multi-contract disputes couldn't be started in a single process. This was problematic, as disputes between the same parties can often concern multiple independent contracts. Fortunately, the rules now invite parties to address all issues in a single reference, driving efficiency and cost saving.
The rules around the early determination process have also been updated for the better. Tribunals now have the power to expedite proceedings by limiting written statements and witness evidence, and by making early determinations in scenarios where cases are advanced which are "manifestly without merit" or outside the arbitral jurisdiction. Although it's yet to be seen how often these powers will be used, we believe that Tribunals being empowered to dispose of claims quickly in appropriate circumstances is undoubtedly the right call.
Finally, the updated rules acknowledge the use of virtual hearings and electronic communications, both of which have proven vital during the COVID-19 pandemic. While the LCIA has said that the pandemic hasn't instituted a change of focus, it has "allowed the LCIA to address explicitly some changes in good practice". Either way, clearer rules over electronic filings and communication (Article 4), and the express provision for the Tribunal to order a virtual hearing (Article 19), are welcome additions to the framework, in our view.
A more in-depth analysis of the LCIA's updated rules is available here. If you'd like to discuss any of the issues raised in this article in greater detail, please contact a member of our Disputes and Investigations team.
Andrew Howell and Natalia Faekova unpack an extraordinary case. A Mexican billionaire's strong fraud claim. Former Israeli intelligence operatives hired to target the defendant's solicitor. Secret recordings over wine and dinner. A judge who called it 'anathema to civil litigation' but may have been 'too lenient'.
19 novembre 2025
During an LSLA lecture on transparency and open justice, Mrs Justice Cockerill, recently appointed as Deputy Head of Civil Justice, outlined a pilot practice direction (PD) that will place select court documents squarely in the public domain via a new, public-facing side of the electronic court file (CE-File).
21 octobre 2025
11 juin 2025
30 janvier 2025
6 décembre 2024
14 novembre 2024
14 novembre 2024
15 octobre 2024
14 décembre 2023
13 décembre 2023
17 octobre 2023
4 août 2023
21 juillet 2023
10 juillet 2023
1 juin 2023
20 avril 2023
8 mars 2023
14 février 2023
13 février 2023
8 février 2023
19 janvier 2023
3 octobre 2022
22 septembre 2022
9 août 2022
25 juillet 2022
6 juillet 2022
Welcome news for those pursuing fraud claims in the English Courts
28 juillet 2022
27 juillet 2022
29 juillet 2022
17 juin 2022
13 juin 2022
26 mai 2022
31 mai 2022
4 avril 2022
5 avril 2022
31 mars 2022
21 septembre 2021
13 septembre 2021
6 septembre 2021
2 août 2021
21 juillet 2021
15 juillet 2021
5 mai 2021
21 avril 2021
31 mars 2021
26 février 2021
24 février 2021
20 janvier 2021
12 janvier 2021
23 novembre 2020
16 octobre 2020
23 septembre 2020
7 octobre 2020
15 avril 2020
27 avril 2020
21 avril 2020
2 juin 2020
16 juin 2020
9 juillet 2020
21 juillet 2020
3 décembre 2021
24 novembre 2021
8 octobre 2021
10 janvier 2022
20 janvier 2022
22 mars 2022
7 avril 2022