8 novembre 2024
Disputes Quick Read – 9 de 105 Publications
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has updated its guidance on the use of Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) – importantly it has made it clear that this is relevant to all NDAs regardless of the context in which the NDA arises. The guidance also makes clear that what is meant by "NDA" is any form of agreement or contract, or a clause within a wider agreement or contract, under which it is agreed that certain information will be kept confidential. This includes agreements with individuals and other commercial parties.
The SRA initially issued a warning notice about the use of NDAs in March 2018. This was in the context of the #MeToo movement and specifically the improper use of NDAs in relation to sexual misconduct which prevented people who had experienced sexual harassment from reporting it to the relevant authorities. It has been updated since then.
The updated guidance provides a reminder of some of the key issues and risks that those dealing with NDAs need to be aware of and the obligations regulated persons have under the general SRA's Code of Conduct. It says it is particularly concerned to ensure that NDAs are not used to prevent reporting to it or to other regulators and enforcement agencies or to prevent disclosures which are protected by law. The guidance states that clauses used must not prevent any such disclosure or give the person expected to agree the NDA the impression that this kind of disclosure is prohibited. This includes other terms in the agreement which might serve to inhibit permitted reporting by way of their operation.
The guidance now has a much broader application and must be considered by anyone regulated by the SRA in whatever situation an NDA (including confidentiality clauses within the context of any wider agreement) is being considered. It will be applicable to in-house lawyers and regulated individuals who manage human resources and complaints in law firms as well as relevant individuals in law firms. It also serves as a reminder to review and update precedents which seek to impose confidentiality obligations on a signatory to ensure they are current and fit for purpose.
The latest guidance is available here.
Andrew Howell and Natalia Faekova unpack an extraordinary case. A Mexican billionaire's strong fraud claim. Former Israeli intelligence operatives hired to target the defendant's solicitor. Secret recordings over wine and dinner. A judge who called it 'anathema to civil litigation' but may have been 'too lenient'.
19 novembre 2025
During an LSLA lecture on transparency and open justice, Mrs Justice Cockerill, recently appointed as Deputy Head of Civil Justice, outlined a pilot practice direction (PD) that will place select court documents squarely in the public domain via a new, public-facing side of the electronic court file (CE-File).
21 octobre 2025
11 juin 2025
30 janvier 2025
6 décembre 2024
14 novembre 2024
14 novembre 2024
15 octobre 2024
14 décembre 2023
13 décembre 2023
17 octobre 2023
4 août 2023
21 juillet 2023
10 juillet 2023
1 juin 2023
20 avril 2023
8 mars 2023
14 février 2023
13 février 2023
8 février 2023
19 janvier 2023
3 octobre 2022
22 septembre 2022
9 août 2022
25 juillet 2022
6 juillet 2022
Welcome news for those pursuing fraud claims in the English Courts
28 juillet 2022
27 juillet 2022
29 juillet 2022
17 juin 2022
13 juin 2022
26 mai 2022
31 mai 2022
4 avril 2022
5 avril 2022
31 mars 2022
21 septembre 2021
13 septembre 2021
6 septembre 2021
2 août 2021
21 juillet 2021
15 juillet 2021
5 mai 2021
21 avril 2021
31 mars 2021
26 février 2021
24 février 2021
20 janvier 2021
12 janvier 2021
23 novembre 2020
16 octobre 2020
23 septembre 2020
7 octobre 2020
15 avril 2020
27 avril 2020
21 avril 2020
2 juin 2020
16 juin 2020
9 juillet 2020
21 juillet 2020
3 décembre 2021
24 novembre 2021
8 octobre 2021
10 janvier 2022
20 janvier 2022
22 mars 2022
7 avril 2022