Disputes Quick Read - What do practitioners think about making alternative dispute resolution (ADR) compulsory?

Quick read

We reported in August on the report by the Civil Justice Council on the issue of compulsory ADR in civil proceedings. Its final recommendations are expected to be published later this year and it is clear that this is likely to lead to change.

In the meantime, the London Chamber of Arbitration and Mediation in conjunction with Herbert Smith have conducted a survey amongst a cross-section of practitioners.

Key points:

There is general support for mandatory ADR for both civil proceedings and arbitration - reflective of the views already being expressed by members of the judiciary and other policy makers.

There is support for costs penalties or some form of stay of proceedings if a party does not participate in a meaningful way in any mandatory process.
The survey asked about the timing of ADR - the greatest support was for it being early in the procedure and before the expense of document disclosure.
There is support for carve-outs where the kind of relief sought is not compensatory damages.

None of this is particularly surprising but the issue, of course, is how this will all work in practice if it is implemented. The questions we identified in our earlier article remain. It will be interesting to see how the Civil Justice Council navigate the issues these questions raise to suit the very broad range of disputes both in court proceedings and arbitration.

Find out more

To discuss the issues raised in this article in more detail, please reach out to a member of our Disputes and Investigations team.

Rechtsgebiete und Gruppen Disputes & Investigations Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit

In dieser Serie

Disputes & Investigations

The sting and the tale

Andrew Howell and Natalia Faekova unpack an extraordinary case. A Mexican billionaire's strong fraud claim. Former Israeli intelligence operatives hired to target the defendant's solicitor. Secret recordings over wine and dinner. A judge who called it 'anathema to civil litigation' but may have been 'too lenient'.

19. November 2025

Disputes & Investigations

Opening the doors: how the January 2026 pilot will transform access to court documents

During an LSLA lecture on transparency and open justice, Mrs Justice Cockerill, recently appointed as Deputy Head of Civil Justice, outlined a pilot practice direction (PD) that will place select court documents squarely in the public domain via a new, public-facing side of the electronic court file (CE-File).

21. Oktober 2025

Disputes & Investigations

Disputes Quick Read: Not your prerogative – the Independent Review of Administrative Law reports its recommendations on judicial review

21. April 2021

Disputes & Investigations

Disputes Quick Read: Should you still choose the English courts to have jurisdiction in your international contracts after Brexit?

12. Januar 2021

Disputes & Investigations

Disputes Quick Read - What do practitioners think about making alternative dispute resolution (ADR) compulsory?

Key points:

Find out more

In dieser Serie

Related Insights

The UK's economic crime revolution: navigating the new era of corporate criminal liability

Staying out of court – the in-house playbook for proactive conflict resolution

Key takeaways from London International Disputes Week 2024