28 May 2026
Publication series – 87 of 86 Insights
Co author: Clara Seitz (Research Assistant)
The Hydrogen Acceleration Act aims to improve the legal framework for the rapid development and expansion of hydrogen infrastructure. The focus is on the production, storage, import and transport of hydrogen. The goal is to advance the ramp-up of the hydrogen economy as a whole.
Until now, the expansion of the hydrogen economy has been significantly delayed by lengthy and complex permitting procedures and a lack of clear prioritisation rules. The draft act addresses this by creating simplified and accelerated procedures with binding structures, thereby providing more reliable framework conditions for the market ramp-up of hydrogen.
The core of the Act consists of procedural facilitations along the entire hydrogen supply chain: from production to import, storage and transport of hydrogen.
In the explanatory memorandum to the Act, climate neutrally produced hydrogen is assigned a central role in a future, resilient and climate neutral energy system. This is particularly relevant for sectors in which direct electrification is not possible or is not economically viable, such as the steel industry, parts of the chemical industry and air, shipping and heavy duty transport.
The Act also stands in the context of the challenges in achieving the 2030 Agenda and emphasises its contribution to climate protection, in particular to Sustainable Development Goal 13 (“Climate action”), as well as to national climate targets, above all the goal of greenhouse gas neutrality by 2045 under the Federal Climate Protection Act.
The scope of the Act is deliberately limited to infrastructure. In the legislative process, the Bundesrat called for the scope to be extended to industrial end use installations for hydrogen (BT printed matter 21/3203), but the Bundestag rejected this, arguing that the explicit aim of the Act is to regulate the production and provision of hydrogen.
A key instrument for accelerating procedures is the determination in Section 4 (1) Hydrogen Acceleration Act that the construction and operation of certain hydrogen installations and pipelines are in the overriding public interest and serve public security until greenhouse gas neutrality is achieved in 2045. Moreover, they are accorded priority in the balancing of protected interests.
This priority, which has so far mainly been known from Section 2 of the Renewable Energy Sources Act in favour of renewable energies, has proved practically effective e.g. in tensions between nature and species protection on the one hand and the energy transition (and thus climate protection) and security of supply on the other.
According to Section 4 (2) and (3) Hydrogen Acceleration Act, however, the overriding public interest does not apply in particular where water management interests, such as public water supply or the water balance, would be significantly impaired by water abstraction by hydrogen installations (in the context of electrolysis). Nor does the priority in balancing apply vis à vis interests of national and alliance defence.
Another focus of the Hydrogen Acceleration Act is the digitalisation and streamlining of administrative procedures. For example, according to Section 5 Hydrogen Acceleration Act, the EIA report must be submitted exclusively in electronic form.
In addition, adjustments are made in various sectoral laws:
However, it should be emphasised that the existing procedural provisions are not fundamentally changed, but are overlaid by supplementary requirements. While this can contribute to acceleration, it also carries the risk of additional complexity for processing by administrative authorities. Any acceleration effect that is actually achieved will depend heavily on the staffing levels and digital equipment of the competent authorities.
Sections 6 and 7 of the Hydrogen Acceleration Act aim to speed up public procurement and review procedures for hydrogen infrastructure. The existing public procurement law under the Act against Restraints of Competition (GWB) is not replaced but specifically modified and supplemented. In particular, the principles of lot division pursuant to Section 97 (4) GWB are made more flexible and the consequences of ineffectiveness under Section 135 GWB are restricted. At the same time, the review procedures under Sections 155 et seq. GWB are streamlined, for example through simplified decisions based on the file and the elimination of the suspensive effect under section 173 GWB. Overall, this results in a targeted shift in favour of rapid project completion, emphasising the overriding public interest.
Pursuant to Section 8 Hydrogen Acceleration Act, objections and actions for annulment against authorisation decisions and against decisions on the early commencement of measures do not have suspensive effect.
Section 9 of the Hydrogen Acceleration Act also concentrates judicial jurisdiction: for certain large scale installations (in particular electrolysers with a capacity of 30 MW or more and storage facilities with a capacity of 25 tonnes or more), the Higher Administrative Courts are competent at first instance. Import installations and their pipelines fall directly within the jurisdiction of the Federal Administrative Court. This eliminates proceedings before the Lower Administrative Courts and is intended to reduce overall procedure times. Section 9 and the concentration of jurisdiction are intended to avoid lengthy chains of instances, enable faster and more uniform decisions and thus accelerate the implementation of key hydrogen projects.
The Act is largely assessed positively and viewed as an important step towards accelerating the hydrogen ramp up. At the same time, it should be noted that its actual success does not depend solely on procedural simplifications for infrastructure, but also significantly on industrial demand and on suitable funding and financing instruments.
Moreover, in view of current energy policy developments, it remains to be assessed whether the expansion of hydrogen based energy production will receive the necessary political backing. It will therefore need to be re-assessed what practical impact the Act will have had in a couple of months or years time.
In addition, further substantive legal adjustments may be required, for example in planning and building law. In particular, there is discussion as to whether the existing provisions on privileged projects in greenfield areaa (Section 249a BauGB) are sufficient or whether further facilitation is necessary in order to avoid lengthy planning procedures and actually accelerate expansion.
26 May 2026
11 May 2026
29 April 2026
24 April 2026
by Multiple authors
24 April 2026
by Johannes Schaadt-Wambach, LL.M. (Prag), Dr. Markus Böhme, LL.M. (Nottingham)
10 March 2026
by Dr. Markus Böhme, LL.M. (Nottingham), Dr. Christian Ertel
18 February 2026
11 February 2026
by Dr. Janina Pochhammer, Dr. Niels L. Lange, LL.M. (Stellenbosch)
14 January 2026
19 December 2025
15 December 2025
2 December 2025
by Multiple authors
28 November 2025
by Multiple authors
26 November 2025
12 November 2025
21 November 2025
by Dr. Markus Böhme, LL.M. (Nottingham), Johannes Schaadt-Wambach, LL.M. (Prag)
22 October 2025
by Multiple authors
23 September 2025
25 September 2025
by Multiple authors
18 September 2025
by Multiple authors
15 September 2025
8 September 2025
8 September 2025
by Dr. Michael Brüggemann, Johannes Schaadt-Wambach, LL.M. (Prag)
18 August 2025
by Johannes Schaadt-Wambach, LL.M. (Prag), Dr. Markus Böhme, LL.M. (Nottingham)
18 August 2025
by Multiple authors
31 July 2025
11 July 2025
by Multiple authors
17 June 2025
by Multiple authors
8 May 2025
by Multiple authors
17 April 2025
by Multiple authors
10 April 2025
by Multiple authors
10 April 2025
26 March 2025
26 March 2025
by Dr. Markus Böhme, LL.M. (Nottingham), Dr. Christian Ertel
26 February 2025
by Multiple authors
6 February 2025
by Multiple authors
11 December 2024
28 November 2024
by Dr. Christian Ertel, Dr. Markus Böhme, LL.M. (Nottingham)
11 November 2024
by Multiple authors
18 September 2024
by Dr. Christian Ertel, Dr. Markus Böhme, LL.M. (Nottingham)
10 September 2024
18 July 2024
by Dr. Patrick Vincent Zurheide, LL.M. (Aberdeen), Dr. Julia Wulff
11 July 2024
27 May 2024
21 February 2024
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
26 January 2024
6 November 2023
by Dr. Niels L. Lange, LL.M. (Stellenbosch), Dr. Janina Pochhammer
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
3 November 2023
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
1 September 2023
by Dr. Paul Voigt, Lic. en Derecho, CIPP/E, Alexander Schmalenberger, LL.B.
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
16 August 2023
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
6 July 2023
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
12 April 2023
by Multiple authors
27 January 2023
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
12 July 2022
by Dr. Paul Voigt, Lic. en Derecho, CIPP/E, Dr. Markus Böhme, LL.M. (Nottingham)
Q&A series: Energy & Infrastructure
10 June 2022
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
5 May 2022
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
27 April 2022
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
15 March 2022
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
14 February 2022
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
11 January 2022
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
2 December 2021
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
21 September 2021
by Olav Nemling
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
18 August 2021
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
12 July 2021
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
8 June 2021
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
25 May 2021
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
6 April 2021
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
23 March 2021