19 décembre 2025
Publication series – 2 de 74 Publications
The permissibility of battery storage systems in outdoor areas was characterized by considerable uncertainty for a long time. Battery storage systems were not expressly regulated in the Building Code (BauGB) and their classification as privileged projects was inconsistent in administrative practice. In some cases, privileged treatment as a public power supply facility pursuant to § 35 (1) No. 3 BauGB and in some cases this was expressly denied.
With the most recent amendments to § 35 (1) No. 3 BauGB, the legislator has introduced independent privileges for battery storage systems for the first time. The new regulation is the result of a short-term and quite turbulent legislative process.
The starting point for the reform was the realization that battery storage systems play a central role in a flexibilized energy system, without their classification under planning law having been clearly defined to date. In the meantime the German Bundestag had even decided on November 13, 2025 to grant largely unrestricted privileges to stand-alone projects. However, after strong headwinds, particularly from the federal states and local authorities, another Bundestag resolution immediately followed on December 4, 2025, which now differentiates the legal situation. It is expected that both resolutions will come into force on January 1, 2026, meaning that the unrestricted regulation will no longer apply and will instead be immediately overlaid by the restricted version.
The version of § 35 (1) No. 3 BauGB then in force distinguishes between two independent facts for battery storage facilities in outdoor areas, each of which is linked to different functional and spatial requirements. The law then does not contain any general privileges that are independent of location.
According to the new § 35 (1) No. 11 BauGB, battery storage systems that are spatially and functionally connected to an existing renewable energy plant are considered privileged. In particular, this includes storage systems that are assigned to a wind energy system or a ground-mounted photovoltaic system and are intended to at least partially absorb its electricity.
The legislator uses the concept of spatial-functional connection known from public planning law. A technically and economically viable connection is required, although the explanatory memorandum to the law leaves the details open. However, a subordinate or serving function of the storage, as previously required for so-called ‘mitgezogene Privilegierung’, is not required.
It is also of practical importance that the privileged storage system does not necessarily have to have been approved on the same planning law basis as the production plant. Battery storage systems that are connected to systems that were themselves built on the basis of a development plan may also be eligible for the privileged status. This significantly expands the scope of application compared to previous constructions of the "mitgezogene Privilegierung".
However, ambiguities remain with regard to the definition of the spatial reference and the question of what stage the production plant must be at in order to be considered "existing". The legislative materials argue in favor of basing this on the time of approval of the production plant in order to avoid accidental results for example due to construction delays.
In addition, § 35 (1) No. 12 BauGB (new version) grants a privilege for stand-alone battery storage systems without direct allocation to a renewable energy plant. However, this option is linked to several cumulative requirements.
Firstly, a minimum capacity of the storage system of 4 MW which, however, will be achieved by the vast majority of stand-alone projects without any problems. It is also necessary that the storage location must be no more than 200 meters from the boundary
It is noteworthy that the law does not expressly require transformer substations to be in operation or approved nor does it require them to be substations of the grid operator. This means that substations planned together with the battery storage system may also fulfill the proximity requirement, which would significantly expand the scope of application of this variant. It also remains unclear how the distance of 200 meters is to be determined. The genesis of the standard and legislative materials speak in favour of a 200-metre distance from property boundary to property boundary; however, a 200-metre corridor is also being discussed, as known, for example, from the privileged approval of ground-mounted PV systems in accordance with § 35 (1) No. 8 BauGB.
In addition the privilege pursuant to § 35 (1) No. 12 BauGB (new version) is subject to an area-related upper limit at municipal level. The total area occupied by privileged battery storage facilities, including ancillary facilities, may not exceed 0.5% of the municipal area per municipality and may not exceed 50,000 m². The limit that is reached first is decisive. This limit means that the realization of larger battery parks in outdoor areas is in fact severely restricted and a "greyhound race" for the reservation of areas per municipality is likely to arise. It should also be noted that the usual calculation of floor space in accordance with the BauNVO should not be applied, but that open spaces and access routes, for example, must also be taken into account.
The new regulation clarifies that although the legislator recognizes battery storage systems as system-relevant/ critical infrastructure, it wants to deliberately steer their siting in outdoor areas. Storage facilities that are either integrated into existing generation structures or are linked to existing energy industry locations are given priority.
At the same time, performance, distance and area criteria are intended to prevent uncontrolled use of outdoor areas and the widespread establishment of large storage parks. The privileged status thus becomes an instrument of spatial control, not a blanket facilitation. In particular for large BESS projects that cannot be accommodated within an area of 5 ha, the possibilities offered by urban land-use planning and planning approval are likely to become increasingly attractive in the future.
Prior to the introduction of the new legal provisions, battery storage facilities in outdoor areas were not expressly privileged. In some cases, approval practice resorted to § 35 (1) No. 3 BauGB and classified storage facilities as installations for the public power supply. This regularly required a particular location and led to widely divergent results across Germany. In several federal states, there were also administrative requirements that fundamentally rejected the privileged treatment of battery storage systems.
Against this backdrop, the new regulation creates an independent assessment standard under federal law for the first time, even if this is associated with restrictions in the most recently adopted version.
The new privileges lead to a clearer system but leave numerous questions of interpretation unanswered. This concerns in particular:
In a motion for a resolution adopted on December 19, 2025, the Federal Council (Bundestag) draws attention to the numerous questions of interpretation and suggests that the standard be tightened up again. Further amendments may therefore be expected in the new year.
Regardless of admissibility under construction planning law, battery storage facilities remain subject to other public law requirements, in particular nature conservation and species protection law, water- and fire protection law and must also continue to overcome the "bottleneck" of grid connection. Only the application in approval practice will show to what extent the new regulation actually contributes to more planning security and an acceleration of storage projects.
par plusieurs auteurs
19 décembre 2025
15 décembre 2025
2 décembre 2025
par plusieurs auteurs
28 novembre 2025
par plusieurs auteurs
26 novembre 2025
12 novembre 2025
21 novembre 2025
par Dr. Markus Böhme, LL.M. (Nottingham), Johannes Schaadt-Wambach, LL.M. (Prag)
22 octobre 2025
par plusieurs auteurs
23 septembre 2025
par Sabine Meister
25 septembre 2025
par plusieurs auteurs
18 septembre 2025
par plusieurs auteurs
15 septembre 2025
8 septembre 2025
8 septembre 2025
par Dr. Michael Brüggemann, Johannes Schaadt-Wambach, LL.M. (Prag)
18 août 2025
par Johannes Schaadt-Wambach, LL.M. (Prag), Dr. Markus Böhme, LL.M. (Nottingham)
18 août 2025
par plusieurs auteurs
31 juillet 2025
11 juillet 2025
par plusieurs auteurs
17 juin 2025
par plusieurs auteurs
8 mai 2025
par plusieurs auteurs
17 avril 2025
par plusieurs auteurs
10 avril 2025
par plusieurs auteurs
10 avril 2025
26 mars 2025
26 mars 2025
par Dr. Markus Böhme, LL.M. (Nottingham), Dr. Christian Ertel
26 février 2025
par plusieurs auteurs
6 février 2025
par plusieurs auteurs
11 décembre 2024
11 décembre 2024
28 novembre 2024
par Dr. Christian Ertel, Dr. Markus Böhme, LL.M. (Nottingham)
11 novembre 2024
11 novembre 2024
par plusieurs auteurs
18 septembre 2024
par Dr. Christian Ertel, Dr. Markus Böhme, LL.M. (Nottingham)
10 septembre 2024
18 juillet 2024
par Dr. Patrick Vincent Zurheide, LL.M. (Aberdeen), Dr. Julia Wulff
11 juillet 2024
par plusieurs auteurs
27 mai 2024
21 février 2024
par plusieurs auteurs
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
26 janvier 2024
6 novembre 2023
par Dr. Niels L. Lange, LL.M. (Stellenbosch), Dr. Janina Pochhammer
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
3 novembre 2023
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
1 septembre 2023
par Dr. Paul Voigt, Lic. en Derecho, CIPP/E, Alexander Schmalenberger, LL.B.
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
16 août 2023
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
6 juillet 2023
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
12 avril 2023
par plusieurs auteurs
27 janvier 2023
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
12 juillet 2022
par Dr. Paul Voigt, Lic. en Derecho, CIPP/E, Dr. Markus Böhme, LL.M. (Nottingham)
Q&A series: Energy & Infrastructure
10 juin 2022
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
5 mai 2022
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
27 avril 2022
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
15 mars 2022
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
14 février 2022
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
11 janvier 2022
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
2 décembre 2021
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
21 septembre 2021
par Olav Nemling
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
18 août 2021
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
12 juillet 2021
par Carsten Bartholl
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
8 juin 2021
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
25 mai 2021
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
6 avril 2021
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
23 mars 2021
par Dr. Christian Ertel et Dr. Markus Böhme, LL.M. (Nottingham)
Power Play: Renewable Energy Update
par plusieurs auteurs
par plusieurs auteurs