Victory for energy companies/defeat for the environment?

In a major development in climate change litigation, the Dutch Court of Appeal has overturned a landmark District Court decision which placed obligations on Shell to reduce its CO2 emissions by 45% by 2030.

Summary

The court held that whilst Shell was required to reduce its emissions, there was insufficient consensus amongst the scientific community as to what specific percentage reduction Shell should be adhering to. The court also considered whose responsibility it is to combat climate change. It found that although companies like Shell have an obligation to limit their CO2 emissions, the burden lays primarily with governments. Our Dutch colleagues have written about the case in more detail here.

Impact

This is a significant setback to activists' attempts to tackle the root cause of climate change through the courts by bringing cases directly against companies in the energy sector, as opposed to the more tried-and-tested method of launching legal challenges against governments in relation to their policies on climate change. The court's analysis demonstrates some of the real hurdles that lie in the way of doing so, without specific legislation or regulation clarifying companies' obligations. The case may therefore encourage activists to return to actions against governments and to reconsider how they can target the private sector.

However, this Court of Appeal case may not be the end of the story as the case could be appealed to the Dutch Supreme Court. We await updates with interest.

执业领域和服务团队纠纷和调查环境、规划与监管项目、能源和基础设施环境、社会和公司治理 (ESG)ESG disputes

行业能源

本系列内容

纠纷和调查

The sting and the tale

Andrew Howell and Natalia Faekova unpack an extraordinary case. A Mexican billionaire's strong fraud claim. Former Israeli intelligence operatives hired to target the defendant's solicitor. Secret recordings over wine and dinner. A judge who called it 'anathema to civil litigation' but may have been 'too lenient'.

2025年11月19日

纠纷和调查

Opening the doors: how the January 2026 pilot will transform access to court documents

During an LSLA lecture on transparency and open justice, Mrs Justice Cockerill, recently appointed as Deputy Head of Civil Justice, outlined a pilot practice direction (PD) that will place select court documents squarely in the public domain via a new, public-facing side of the electronic court file (CE-File).

2025年10月21日

纠纷和调查

Disputes Quick Read: Not your prerogative – the Independent Review of Administrative Law reports its recommendations on judicial review

2021年4月21日

纠纷和调查

Disputes Quick Read: Should you still choose the English courts to have jurisdiction in your international contracts after Brexit?

2021年1月12日

纠纷和调查